[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [syndication] Re: robots.txt and rss



Thanks Phil and Dave, this is very helpful info. I will dig into this very soon. I just took a look at the code and the RSS version
is determined by:

1 - the version attribute
2 - The URI of a DTD
3 - An xml namespace reference to http://purl.org/rss/1.0/

If done by DTD, the DTD URI is mapped to a version per the following table:

mysql> select * from rss_info;
+-------------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------+-------------+
| rss_version | is_primary | dtd_uri                                             | description |
+-------------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------+-------------+
| 0.91        |          1 | http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd |             |
| 0.92        |          1 | http://www.scripting.com/dtd/rss-0.92.dtd           |             |
| 1.0         |          1 | http://purl.org/rss/1.0/                            |             |
| 0.92d2      |          0 | http://www.scripting.com/dtd/rss-0.92.dtd           |             |
| 0.91fn      |          0 | http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd |             |
+-------------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------+-------------+

Is there a better way to do this?

Jeff;

----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Ringnalda" <phil@philringnalda.com>
To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: [syndication] Re: robots.txt and rss


> Jeff Barr wrote:
> > Dave,
> >
> >> BTW, a question for you. When will Syndic8 stop counting RSS 0.90
> >> feeds as if they were 1.0 feeds?
> >
> > Do you have an example feed that I can look at?
>
>
> Feed ID 1866 ( http://linuxtoday.com/backend/my-netscape.rdf ) - identified
> as RSS 1.0 on the feed info page, but with a default namespace of
> http://my.netscape.com/rdf/simple/0.9/ that's 0.90 (I found it by googling
> for the 0.90 namespace). You aren't trying to identify 0.90 by version="",
> are you? I see that's listed as a tag with zero feeds using it, but AFAIK
> 0.90 didn't have a version attribute, just the namespace.
>
> Phil Ringnalda
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>