[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [syndication] My take on shared feed lists
- To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [syndication] My take on shared feed lists
- From: Jeremy Zawodny <jeremy@zawodny.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:18:05 -0700
- In-reply-to: <059501c39321$67c28130$200ca8c0@wkearney.com>
- References: <3F8C650B.30608@wingedpig.com> <050d01c392c5$db06bb90$200ca8c0@wkearney.com> <20031015060618.GE4865@thermal> <059501c39321$67c28130$200ca8c0@wkearney.com>
- Sender: Jeremy Zawodny <jzawodn@thermal>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:36:56AM -0400, Bill Kearney wrote:
> From: "Jeremy Zawodny" <jeremy@zawodny.com>
> > > Unless it's not clear what 'level' of the URL pathname at which it's
> > > to be found. Then you'd end up on fishing expeditions, blindly
> > > stabbing for files and possibly getting the wrong ones.
> >
> > What are these levels you speak of?
>
> If the idea of a static filename is promoted, where is it going to be found?
>
> http://somesite.hosted.example.com/users/jwz/weblog/default.xml
> http://somesite.hosted.example.com/users/jwz/default.xml
> http://somesite.hosted.example.com/users/default.xml
> http://somesite.hosted.example.com/default.xml
>
> If the idea of a static fallback file is promoted, in lieu of link
> tags, we end up with the very high likelihood of scripts running
> amok crawling up/down the URL hierarchy levels.
Oh, I understand your objection now, thanks.
This was a probably a vague explanation on my part. I didn't intend
to suggest a fall-back filename. I intended to suggest a fall-back
URL.
So the only valid example from your list above is:
http://somesite.hosted.example.com/default.xml
Now I see where your concerns about crazy-ass spiders wandering the
whole site "tree" are coming from.
This helps a lot, thanks.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@Zawodny.com> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/