[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [syndication] My take on shared feed lists
- To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [syndication] My take on shared feed lists
- From: Jeremy Zawodny <jeremy@zawodny.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 23:06:18 -0700
- In-reply-to: <050d01c392c5$db06bb90$200ca8c0@wkearney.com>
- References: <3F8C650B.30608@wingedpig.com> <050d01c392c5$db06bb90$200ca8c0@wkearney.com>
- Sender: Jeremy Zawodny <jzawodn@thermal>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:41:36PM -0400, Bill Kearney wrote:
> >
> > Obviously, in this case, much less bandwidth will be used if there's
> > just a standard naming convention and we don't try to look for <link>
> > tags. We'd only have to fetch one file.
>
> Unless it's not clear what 'level' of the URL pathname at which it's
> to be found. Then you'd end up on fishing expeditions, blindly
> stabbing for files and possibly getting the wrong ones.
What are these levels you speak of?
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@Zawodny.com> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/