Re: [syndication] RSS 0.91's Future

["Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>]

Exactly right. The silly limits in 0.91 have always been ignored by some.
Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Bond" <julian@netmarketseurope.com>
To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: [syndication] RSS 0.91's Future


> In article <LPBBLCJIHOIDJNIFKFBPGELFCNAA.alis@contentrelations.com>,
> Alis Marsden <alis@contentrelations.com> writes
> >If RSS ceases development at RSS 0.91, regardless of whether RSS 0.92+/
RSS
> >1.0+ are called RSS-Something or something else altogether, what happens
if
> >RSS 0.91 needs changes?
> >
> >I'm not talking further development of RSS 0.91 but just the stuff that
> >makes logical sense and needs doing.
>
> The de facto standard out there is actually 0.91 and a half. eg 0.91
> with limits removed, encoded (mostly) html in the description and
> sometimes <link> and/or <title> optional. Regardless of the spec, this
> is the real 0.91
>
> --
> Julian Bond eMail: julian@netmarketseurope.com
> HomeURL: http://www.shockwav.demon.co.uk/
> WorkURL: http://www.netmarketseurope.com/
> WebLog: http://roguemoon.manilasites.com/
> M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173  T: +44 (0)20 7420 4363
> ICQ:33679668 tag:So many words, so little time
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>