Re: [syndication] Re: RSS 0.91 vs 0.90 according to My.UserLand

["Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>]

I'm sure there's equivalent bias in XML-tree, yet it also showed a majority
of the feeds are 0.91. Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 5:06 PM
Subject: [syndication] Re: RSS 0.91 vs 0.90 according to My.UserLand


> Dave Winer <dave@userland.com> wrote:
>
> > Of the nine RDF files with namespaces at purl.org, seven were synthetic,
from
> > Aaron's blogspace service.
>
> Are you implying that just because people don't want to write an RSS file
> and an HTML file, their RSS feed isn't as good?
>
> > Net-net, among the sites registered with My.UserLand that are updating
this
> > weekend, the dominant format is 0.91.
>
> I think that this demonstrates that who hang around Dave Winer, and thus
> My.UserLand like 0.91. ;-)
>
> Should I insert all my 0.9 and 1.0 feeds into My.UserLand?
>
> --
> [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>