[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RSS 0.91 vs 0.90 according to My.UserLand
- To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: RSS 0.91 vs 0.90 according to My.UserLand
- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 19:06:47 -0500
- In-reply-to: <08f301c0d687$571cd410$33a1dc40@murphy>
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.1.3108
Dave Winer <dave@userland.com> wrote:
> Of the nine RDF files with namespaces at purl.org, seven were synthetic, from
> Aaron's blogspace service.
Are you implying that just because people don't want to write an RSS file
and an HTML file, their RSS feed isn't as good?
> Net-net, among the sites registered with My.UserLand that are updating this
> weekend, the dominant format is 0.91.
I think that this demonstrates that who hang around Dave Winer, and thus
My.UserLand like 0.91. ;-)
Should I insert all my 0.9 and 1.0 feeds into My.UserLand?
--
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]