[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [syndication] RSS-Classic, RSS 1.0 and a historical debt

To: syndication@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [syndication] RSS-Classic, RSS 1.0 and a historical debt
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:05:53 -0800
Cc: rss developers <rss-dev@egroups.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0011071323400.20581-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>; from daniel.brickley@bristol.ac.uk on Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 04:04:28PM +0000
References: <B62D5D7A.1C3C6%aswartz@swartzfam.com> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0011071323400.20581-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 04:04:28PM +0000, Dan Brickley wrote:
> I don't make these points to embarrass Dave (I don't believe that's even
> possible), but to put a stop to a pointless debate.
> 
> "RSS 1.0" and "RSS-Classic" work just fine. Let's get back to the real
> work...

Dan,

Thanks for that; I've been wanting to know the background here for some
time, and that makes it a lot clearer what's been going on.



-- 
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/

References:
- Re: RSS 1.0 Release Candidate 1 (DRAFT)
  - From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- RSS-Classic, RSS 1.0 and a historical debt
  - From: Dan Brickley <daniel.brickley@bristol.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS-Classic, RSS 1.0 and a historical debt
Next by Date: RE: [syndication] Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS-Classic, RSS 1.0 and a historical debt
Previous by thread: Re: [syndication] Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS-Classic, RSS 1.0 and a historical debt
Next by thread: RE: [syndication] RSS-Classic, RSS 1.0 and a historical debt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread