Re: Thoughts, questions, and issues.

[Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>]

Paulo Gaspar <Paulo.Gaspar@krankikom.de> wrote:

> What I would like:
> * the simple stuff (almost) as it was
> - (almost) no changes here;
> * extensibility and RDF functionality
> - no problem with the added complexity for these uses.

How is this different from the current spec? There are only a couple of
changes like <inchannel> elements and rdf:about attributes, and these are to
meet your second goal (RDF functionality). If you can figure out a way to do
it better, let us know -- we'd love to hear it.

-- 
        Aaron Swartz         |"This information is top security.
<http://swartzfam.com/aaron/>|     When you have read it, destroy yourself."
  <http://www.theinfo.org/>  |             - Marshall McLuhan