RE: [syndication] Re: Thoughts, questions, and issues.

["Paulo Gaspar" <Paulo.Gaspar@krankikom.de>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken MacLeod [mailto:ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 06:44
> 
> A common [bad] argument for RDF and namespaces has been "if you don't
> want to use it, you can stay backwards and stagnant."  There are
> better arguments, we need to be making them clearer.

Thanks Ken.

I sure hope so. That sentence sounds too much like:
  "It is my ball and we play by my rules".

Anyway, the only problem I have with the changes is that:
  - the simple stuff is not so simple anymore and it is too different.

What I like is:
  - one can do a lot more.

What I would like:
 * the simple stuff (almost) as it was
    - (almost) no changes here;
 * extensibility and RDF functionality 
    - no problem with the added complexity for these uses.

Currently the "(almost)" is too big.


Have fun,
Paulo