[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [syndication] RFC: myPublicFeeds.opml
With all due respect, you still haven't provided either a reason not to do
it this way, or a realistic alternative.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Gregorio" <joe@bitworking.org>
To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [syndication] RFC: myPublicFeeds.opml
> Dave Winer wrote:
> > You say it "isn't a good idea" and don't explain why.
>
> I didn't think I need to as Tim's comments seemed clear
> and didn't require any elaboration.
>
> > TBL says it isn't a good idea because the owner of the site owns the
> > namespace, which makes sense, but robots.txt et al already offer
features
> > based on common file names.
>
> One of the problems is that the agent is
> in effect 'shooting blind' when it goes to get a robots.txt
> or a favicon.ico. And each and every server will
> get hits for these files even if they don't
> support them. My site alone gets over a 100
> hits a day for 'robots.txt' and even more
> hits for favicon.ico.
>
> > TBL is bucking a long-term trend here. Operating systems have always had
> > known locations for special configuration files.
>
> And locations for special configuration files are exactly
> what he is talking about here and from my reading he is
> not eschewing the need, only the implementation. That is,
> he seems to accept the need for such information, just that
> there is a problem with hard-coding the URIs, and that a more
> general and extensible mechanism is needed for how to locate
> all the 'special configuration files'.
>
> > Joe, it's a hopeless argument. There have to be some config files. Have
to
> > be. Not an option. Try to get rid of them is like trying to boil the
ocean.
>
> Again, no one is arguing for their removal, just a more extensible
> generic mechanism than "Stuff this file in the root of your URI space."
>
> Thanks,
> -joe
>
> --
> http://BitWorking.org
> http://WellFormedWeb.org
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>