[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why not use the guid? (was Re: [syndication] Yahoo! News RSS Feeds Launched)
- To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Why not use the guid? (was Re: [syndication] Yahoo! News RSS Feeds Launched)
- From: Mark Fletcher <markf@wingedpig.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:42:38 -0700
- In-reply-to: <153601c36c2a$5b8624d0$6501a8c0@murphy3>
- References: <20030813205126.GA2755@thermal> <20030826210126.GA26999@thermal> <3F4BE22C.9010506@wingedpig.com> <153601c36c2a$5b8624d0$6501a8c0@murphy3>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030701
Dave Winer wrote:
They have a guid on each item -- why not use it?
http://backend.userland.com/permalinksNewsAggregators
Of course we use the guid. That's our index (along with the site id)
into the database for each item. It's also how we can tell that a
particular item has been changed or edited. So we have cases where there
are new items, when the guid doesn't appear in the database, and cases
where items have been edited, because we go in and compare different
fields of the item with what we fetched last time. We highlight the item
in either case.
So in this case, the guids were fine and we were able to fetch the
previously-fetched items out of our database. We then compared the
various parts of each item to our previously fetched info, like the
description, title, and link. The links were different, so we considered
the items to be updated, which we highlighted for our users.
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark Fletcher
Bloglines
http://www.bloglines.com