RE: [syndication] Archival RSS: Toward Weblog Portability

["Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>]

Hallo Thomas & everybody,

The list is unmoderated, so Bill can't at present be banned from the list.

I too am rather curious about the facts.

Dave said:
Actually Radio has a fully general templating capability.

Bill said:
Uh, not for RSS it doesn't.

Can someone not connected to either Dave or Bill please confirm or refute
the following statement:

Radio has a fully general templating capability in its RSS output.

Cheers,
Danny.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Hofmann [mailto:Thomas@th-o.de]
> Sent: 01 May 2003 16:29
> To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [syndication] Archival RSS: Toward Weblog Portability
>
>
> Hallo Dave, hallo everybody,
>
> I must confess, that I did not understand both of the parties.
> So I also cannot say you were right or Bill were right.
> May be I am to new at this technology but I only wanted
> to appeal to both you and Bill to describe in traceable
> manner, what are the facts in your dispute. Without that
> I am not able to understand, what you mean as in the
> same way as Bill. I think there are more people in the
> list who may have the same opinion.
>
> A question to your last mail. Does this mean, Bill is
> banned now from the list and also the other cannot
> read him anymore?
>
> To my person myself (if some are interested ;-) ).
> I am working since 1996 with SGML. My company is a
> legal publisher. I maintain the markup tools and
> stay for the quality of our data pool (the documents).
> To RSS I came over the discovery of weblogs.
> One of a german weblog owner "Der Schockwellenreiter"
> described in german (and so easier readable for
> most of us here) what RSS are. So my interest
> and my subscription to this group. I surfed
> and searched about 5 till 6 hours in the web and
> found (as it seams to me) the two antagonised 
> parties related to RSS. I have till now not
> clearly understood, how it arised and what was the
> historical evolution. Yes, I have ridden the pages
> on userland. But for all that.
>
> This in short, best greetings, Thomas
>
>
> > Thomas, I agree totally.
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Thomas Hofmann" <Thomas@th-o.de>
> > To: <syndication@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 9:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: [syndication] Archival RSS: Toward Weblog Portability
>
>
> >> Hallo everybody,
> >>
> >> please tell me, what a picture should bring us this?
> >> Who is everytime right? I think no one. If it were
> >> so, he were god.
> >>
> >> "Oh, we should build him a church!" ;-)
> >>
> >> I think it would help the subscribers of this list more, if
> >> we would get some technical facts insteed of
> >> an assertion without understandable explanatory statement.
> >> Could be some truth in this opinion?
> >>
> >> wish you al a nice day, Thomas
>
> --
> >>[ Thomas Hofmann, 84405 Dorfen, Marienplatz 1 * http://www.th-o.de ]<<
> | Ins Web mit Bürgernetz __ http://www.iivs.de/ | Kalenderrechnung ___ |
> | Buchbach online  http://www.iivs.de/buchbach/ | Smilies ____________ |
> | Home of SGML _______ http://www.th-o.de/sgml/ | Tagebuchprogramm ___ |
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>