Re: [syndication] RSS feeds for bookmarks

[Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>]

I used 1.0 because one can extend it with metadata, and because I
happened to have the XMLGenerator code sitting around to spit out
1.0. I don't use Perl ;)


On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 02:42:18PM +0000, Julian Bond wrote:
> In article <1006692701.3c00e95d99c50@webmail.uni2.dk>, John Gotze
> <john@gotzespace.dk> writes
> >Syndication of bookmarks/links is not optimal in RSS 0.91, which I use. I see 
> >you, Mark, use, RSS 1.0. Do you think this is the optimal way to syndicate 
> >bookmarks?
> 
> Why is 0.9x sub-optimal for bookmarks? Surely it's just <item> =
> bookmark, <link> = URL, <title>=text description? 
> 
> -- 
> Julian Bond    email: julian_bond@voidstar.com
> CV/Resume:         http://www.voidstar.com/cv/
> WebLog:               http://www.voidstar.com/
> M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173  T: +44 (0)192 0412 433
> ICQ:33679568 tag:So many words, so little time
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 

-- 
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/