Re: [syndication] Re: LINK support in Mozilla 0.95

[Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>]

It depends on where you put the LINK - if it's on the summary page
(e.g., www.cnn.com), it's perfectly appropriate. If it's on one of
the articles themselves (e.g., www.cnn.com/today/someNewsItem),
definately not.


On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:57:40AM -0700, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:
> 2001-10-17 06:09:53, "Mark Paschal" <markpasc@mindspring.com>:
> 
> Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >> <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" href="..."
> >> title="..."/> 
> 
> rel="alternate" means it's an alternate version of the
> *current* document (e.g. a PDF version). I don't think
> this is an appropiate link type.
> 
> -- 
> Karl Ove Hufthammer
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 

-- 
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/