Re: [syndication] New poll for syndication

[Julian Bond <julian@netmarketseurope.com>]

In article <069x8OAToJG7EAAu@netmarketseurope.com>, Julian Bond
<julian@netmarketseurope.com> writes
>In article <991461453.88.84513.f4@yahoogroups.com>,
>syndication@yahoogroups.com writes
>>  o I would like to see the RSS efforts renamed, but keep some relation  to 
>RSS. 
>>RSS 0.9 and 0.91 remain the same, and are frozen. 
>
>If this choice wins out, then defining "some" in "some relation" is
>going to be tricky. To my reading there's not a lot of difference
>between choice 1 and 2. Would RDFSS 1.0 fall into the first voting
>choice or second?

Replying to my own posts again. I've just gone and re-read the poll. 

I find the questions ambiguous. My preference is for:- 

- "RSS" to refer to 0.90 and 0.91
- 0.92 and above and 1.0 and above to change their names
- That these names may contain the letters R, S and S.
- But that "RSS - (Some word)" is not going to work.

This appears to be option 1, but I just know that option 1 will be taken
to be a vote of confidence in "RSS-something", which I consider to be
stupid and likely to just keep the pot of bugs boiling.

-- 
Julian Bond eMail: julian@netmarketseurope.com
HomeURL: http://www.shockwav.demon.co.uk/ 
WorkURL: http://www.netmarketseurope.com/
WebLog: http://roguemoon.manilasites.com/
M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173  T: +44 (0)20 7420 4363  
ICQ:33679668 tag:So many words, so little time