Re: RFC: Clearing confusion for RSS, agreement for forward motion

[rael@oreilly.com]

--- In syndication@y..., Aaron Swartz <aswartz@s...> wrote:
> Dave Winer <dave@u...> wrote:
> 
> > I don't want to carry the RSS name forward.
> 
> And we do. Sorry. 

You do, Aaron, and I may want to -- indeed my lean is towards that at present.  Indeed there have been several times when I'd have had no problem with xRSS or eRSS or indeed RSSx (RSSe seemed a little odd, for some reason).  

But I want to hear from folks other than myself about the pluses and minuses of each approach so that I can vote well when it comes down to it.

> RSS-Semantic seems like a good compromise to me, but we
> can always leave the name as it is.

I'm afraid my view diverges from the implicit either/or in that statement.

Rael