Re: RFC: Clearing confusion for RSS, agreement for forward motion

[Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>]

Dave Winer <dave@userland.com> wrote:

> When the right names are arrived at, if they are, RSS will be simple and
> easy to understand, as it once was, and both paths forward will have an
> equal chance at attracting users. Lots more to say about it, but it all
> boils down to this.

Now I'm confused -- I thought you said that you were willing to take the
pain of changing the name to stop the confusion. I'm proposing a simple
solution that even allows your version to keep the name RSS if you want. You
don't have to according to the proposal -- it's only a suggestion -- but you
can. What's wrong with that?

-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]