Re: RFC: Clearing confusion for RSS, agreement for forward motion

[Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>]

Dave Winer <dave@userland.com> wrote:

> OK, I've given this some thought, I'd like everyone to keep discussing even
> if there are points of disagreement. There may be holes in what I'm
> proposing. So please read this carefully, give it some thought, if you see a
> problem, state it. Items 1-5 are recitals, and 6-14 form a proposal. I am
> not a lawyer, and did not have my lawyer review this document before posting
> it.

Just looking at this quickly, not reading it thoroughly, this looks like a
huge step forward. Thanks for taking the leap of courage, Dave.

-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]