[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [syndication] Announce: RSS 0.93 open for discussion
In article <18f701c0c9b8$9aec8090$33a1dc40@murphy2>, Dave Winer
<dave@userland.com> writes
> 1. I started a new page for notes on RSS 0.93, which is an
> evolution of RSS 0.92. [1]
I don't think that this should be required but I think it should be
recommended that <link> is included for all items in any RSS feed. It
should point at the URL for the web based page of which the item is an
abstract. This simply reflects common usage. Sites that don't do this
should be encouraged to do it.
<source> should then be used to cite the source that the item was
developed from.
eg. I write a story which is a comment about a Wired article. <link>
should point at my story, <source> should point at the Wired article.
Going down this route suggests that each <item> should be allowed to
have multiple <source> with one for each link in the page at <link>
--
Julian Bond eMail: julian@netmarketseurope.com
HomeURL: http://www.shockwav.demon.co.uk/
WorkURL: http://www.netmarketseurope.com/
WebLog: http://roguemoon.manilasites.com/
M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173 T: +44 (0)20 7420 4363
ICQ:33679668 tag:So many words, so little time