[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [syndication] Re: rss story fact checking
- To: syndication@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [syndication] Re: rss story fact checking
- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 09:34:40 -0700
- Cc: aking@internet.com
- In-reply-to: <085001c0d4a2$2ac9c2b0$33a1dc40@murphy>; from dave@userland.com on Fri, May 04, 2001 at 06:57:32AM -0700
- References: <NEBBKHNOHCJCMAHGCNBGMEAIDLAA.aking@internet.com> <085001c0d4a2$2ac9c2b0$33a1dc40@murphy>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 06:57:32AM -0700, Dave Winer wrote:
> As one of the authors of 0.91, which is the spec that most people
> code their RSS channels to
What's the basis for this claim? Most of those that I stumble across
are 0.9 or 1.0, though I just look at the ones that I'm interested
in, so it's not representative.
Cheers,
--
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/