RE: [syndication] Some suggestions for RSS .92

["Paulo Gaspar" <Paulo.Gaspar@krankikom.de>]

Ken has point there. A WG for 0.9x should take a step forward.

Dave Winer has been collecting suggestions for 0.92 so...

Paulo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken MacLeod [mailto:ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 18:55
> 
> All I'm saying there is that had that there been a formal working
> group composed of even simply the posting members of the time who had
> a known contribution to RSS, the results would be much clearer now.
> 
> The cycle is being repeated again, by the way.  The lack of a clear
> working group and/or process for RSS 0.91+ is stalling those efforts
> (not interference, as suggested).  Proposals, discussion, and
> resolutions should happen relatively quickly.  Yet without a known
> process, people are trying to suggest or propose things, are being
> told their not doing it right (what?!), it's not clear who can make
> things official, and it's certainly not clear what or whose act needs
> to be accomplished to actually get things adopted.
> 
>   -- Ken
> 
> 
>