Re: New poll for syndication

[Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>]

Mark Nottingham wrote:

> o contribute to development of RDF syndication ("RSS1.0")
> o contribute to further development of RSS ("RSS0.92")

Why are these two choices mutually exclusive? Can't we contribute to further
development of RSS through 1.0 -- that is why it's called 1.0, after all.

Also, I don't believe RSS 1.0 is really about RDF syndication. It's not
completely about syndication, and only happens to use RDF (because it's
useful). Perhaps the poll could be rewritten to make this more clear?

-- 
        Aaron Swartz         |"This information is top security.
<http://swartzfam.com/aaron/>|     When you have read it, destroy yourself."
  <http://www.theinfo.org/>  |             - Marshall McLuhan