Re: Thoughts, questions, and issues.

[ed@epicentric.com]

--- In syndication@egroups.com, Aaron Swartz <aswartz@s...> wrote:
> This is becoming a bit of a FAQ. Once again, we want
> backwards-compatibility. This is the way it was done in RSS 0.9 
(for no good
> reason) and we didn't want to change it. This was fixed in RSS 0.91 
(which
> most of you use) but the new spec is based on 0.9. Does that make 
sense?

I'm sure this has been answered already, but why do we need to be 
backwards compatible with 0.9?  Didn't someone post here that only 
like 11% of RSS feeds were in 0.9?

Ed