[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <http: //express.isyndicate.com/help/xml_faq.html>
iSyndicate offers headline blocks in two different XML formats: our own Express
XML, and Netscape's RSS (Rich Site
Summary).
Express XML Format
An example of a headline in Express XML:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<newsfeed>
<channel cid="auctionwatch.tips.hl"
title="AuctionWatch.com:
Tips & Tactics" date="03/13/2000"
time="08:45 PST">
<headline
href="http://headlines.isyndicate.com/pscripts/hit/
encrypted_headline.html" date="Tue,
March 14, 2000 04:08 PM"
time="04:08 PST">Keeping
Records</headline>
</channel>
<channel
cid="about.talking_home_family.hl" title="About.com:
They're Talking About Home/Family"
date="03/09/2000" time="12:54 PST">
<headline
href="http://headlines.isyndicate.com/pscripts/hit/
encrypted_headline.html" date="Fri,
March 17, 2000 01:48 PM"
time="01:48 PST">Mean
Moms?</headline>
</channel>
</newsfeed>
Netscape's RSS Format
An example of a headline in Netscape's
RSS:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
<title>auctionwatch.tips.hl</title>
<description>AuctionWatch.com: Tips
& Tactics</description>
<pubDate>03/13/2000 08:45
PST</pubDate>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Keeping Records</title>
<link>http://headlines.isyndicate.com/pscripts/hit/
encrypted_headline.html</link>
</item>
</channel>
<channel>
<title>about.talking_home_family.hl</title>
<description>About.com: They're
Talking About Home/Family</description>
<pubDate>03/09/2000 12:54
PST</pubDate>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Mean Moms?</title>
<link>http://headlines.isyndicate.com/pscripts/hit/
encrypted_headline.html</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
Because we offer the option to have more
than one source feed per page,
iSyndicate's use of RSS deviates from the
official DTD.
> Bring them to the table, and ask them to make a contribution. I know the
> people at iSyndicate, we had philosophic differences when this stuff
> started, but now we're singing almost the same tune.
I will pass along the message.
> By going the "extensibility" route you're going to raise the barrier to
> stratospheric levels, you'll never see those 6 million feeds, it will
> coalesce to just a few sources.
I agree with that point - we can't make this stuff too difficult for people
to work with. But I like Steve Agalloco's comment:
> The core is enough to keep things simple. Those of us that choose
> to make it extensible must do so by creating modules.
A clean, simple core, but not a closed core. That's the best of
both worlds.
--
Stephen Downes - Information Architect - University of Alberta
stephen.downes@ualberta.ca http://www.atl.ualberta.ca/downes